[harley2007]

Well, I just got my PPS yesterday, brand spanking new. Went to the range, first a total of 66 rounds. 50 of Blazer Brass, 12 of Winchester white box and 4 others. Loved it, it shot great, but on round 66, wouldnt eject the brass...I fumbled with it for a minute before I realized it extracted the extractor!!

A brand new gun, was to be my new carry gun...now it has to go back to Walther....I have never had this happen before and I know these things can happen (duh, obviously! :icon_neutral but it still is frustrating.

As far as shootability, it handled not much differently than my Kahr PM9 from a recoil standpoint....much easier than my old Glock 27...

Anyways, here is a pic of the "parts" of my new gun!!!:tired:...see lower right of picture for the missing pieces!!!

 

[RETSUPT99]

That's a real 'bummer'...enough to ruin anyone's day...sorry to hear this, hope it's repaired and back to you soon.:blink:

 

[harley2007]

I am a HUGE fan of Glocks, and I know any piece of machinery can and will break down, but this is exactly why I wish Glock made a single stack gun.

Of course I am not giving up on this gun but I lose faith and always worry going forward, but hopefully this is more an issue of someone at the factory improperly assembling something etc.....because it doesnt look like anything broke more like it just popped out...but I am not sure if there are any other missing peices.

 

[matdicdad]

Wow, that would be depressing to me. I have a XD40sc that had problems right out of the box. It got sent back to Springfield, they took care of it and haven't had a problem since. Hope it works out like that for you.

 

[skot]

I read on another forum before where a guy had the same thing happen. He said he just put it back together and then ran another 100 rounds through without any problems. It sounds like maybe it just wasn't seated correctly when assembled or some thing.

If it were mine I'd probably send it in and let the pro's take a look at it though.

Hopefully this will be your only problem.

 

[shooterX]

Bummer harley, hope it works out!

 

[harley2007]

I read on another forum before where a guy had the same thing happen. He said he just put it back together and then ran another 100 rounds through without any problems. It sounds like maybe it just wasn't seated correctly when assembled or some thing.

If it were mine I'd probably send it in and let the pro's take a look at it though.

Hopefully this will be your only problem.

I would have done that but one of the springs couldnt be found, the retainer spring is in the picture but the other one is lost.....so off to Walther it goes.

 

[TX-JB]

Too bad, sorry to hear about it...Hope it gets fixed and back to you before the holidays are over...

 

[harley2007]

Me too, this was to be my new primary CCW.:aargh4:

 

[Saber]

I am a HUGE fan of Glocks, and I know any piece of machinery can and will break down, but this is exactly why I wish Glock made a single stack gun...

Actually, the GLOCK 36 is a single stack, and I owned one. I sold it for no good reason and its one of the few guns I wish I held on to. Here's an excerpt from their website:

Slim & Powerful

Six rounds of .45 AUTO. . ... in a package that
fits into the hands of any user.
With the new GLOCK SLIMLINE™ we present
grip ergonomics of the next dimension.
By using a single-stack magazine, the GLOCK 36 measures only 28.5mm/1.13 in. in width. Together with the secure-grip design, this makes handling the pistol very easy.

Anyway, have a good one ~
Regards,

 

[ctr]

Sorry to hear about the extractor. I've had my share of issues with Walthers. They make good guns, I just have not owned any of them.

I have the Glock 36. It is a great 45 for carry. I replaced the stock trigger spring with a 5.5 lb one for a bit of extra safety. It is a really nice piece.

Lots of folks like the Walthers, but for me, I won't own another one. Too many issues.

 

[10thmtn]

Thin 9mm's worth it?

I sometimes wish for a "smaller" pistol than my G26. I took a look at the specs, however, and other than being thinner, there is not much difference between the G26 and the thinner competition:

G26 6.3 x 4.2

PPS 6.3 x 4.4
Taurus 709 6.2 x 4.5
PF9 5.9 x 4.3

The micro 9mm's are smaller, but have other issues:

PM9 5.6 x 4.3 (I've owned two, lots of issues)
R9 5.2 x 3.7 (too expensive, not +P compatible, mag release on heel, no slide lock open when empty, etc)

So, for the extra 0.25 or so in width, you get Glock reliability and extra ammo capacity. And, you can reload with a 15- or 17-round mag. Good trade-off, IMHO. Think I'll stick with my G26!:yup:

PS - I do hope they make yours right!

 

[Mardet65]

Sorry to hear about the new gun . . . hope it gets better.

 

[harley2007]

Actually, the GLOCK 36 is a single stack, and I owned one. I sold it for no good reason and its one of the few guns I wish I held on to. Here's an excerpt from their website:

Slim & Powerful

Six rounds of .45 AUTO. . ... in a package that
fits into the hands of any user.
With the new GLOCK SLIMLINE™ we present
grip ergonomics of the next dimension.
By using a single-stack magazine, the GLOCK 36 measures only 28.5mm/1.13 in. in width. Together with the secure-grip design, this makes handling the pistol very easy.

Anyway, have a good one ~
Regards,

I have a Glock 30 and love it but wanted the Walther PPS in 40...it is WAY slimmer than a G36...

 

[harley2007]

I sometimes wish for a "smaller" pistol than my G26. I took a look at the specs, however, and other than being thinner, there is not much difference between the G26 and the thinner competition:

G26 6.3 x 4.2

PPS 6.3 x 4.4
Taurus 709 6.2 x 4.5
PF9 5.9 x 4.3

The micro 9mm's are smaller, but have other issues:

PM9 5.6 x 4.3 (I've owned two, lots of issues)
R9 5.2 x 3.7 (too expensive, not +P compatible, mag release on heel, no slide lock open when empty, etc)

So, for the extra 0.25 or so in width, you get Glock reliability and extra ammo capacity. And, you can reload with a 15- or 17-round mag. Good trade-off, IMHO. Think I'll stick with my G26!:yup:

PS - I do hope they make yours right!

Yes but I own the G29 and the G19 and a G30 and a PM9 and I can tell you for certain the PPS being thinner makes a difference. For double stack, Glock wins, hands down, but for single, my Kahr and this Walther is nice just had a mishap and hope it can be fixed.

Honestly, there is a different niche for the single stacks and Glock is missing the boat by not entering the market.....

 

[shane1]

Thats too bad. Good luck and I agree with the G36.

shane

 

[rocky]

Wow, I imagine they will take care of it for you. I have had zero problems with my PPS in 9mm, run it through its paces hard once they fix it. Hopefully it was just a bad part that snuck through QC.

 

[ppkheat]

My PPS 9mm shoots like a dream, I hope you can get yours squared away.

 

[jhh3rd]

I know of a fellow who sent his PPS .40 cal back three times and S&W finally replaced it. New one runs fine.

 

[10thmtn]

Yes but I own the G29 and the G19 and a G30 and a PM9 and I can tell you for certain the PPS being thinner makes a difference. For double stack, Glock wins, hands down, but for single, my Kahr and this Walther is nice just had a mishap and hope it can be fixed.

Honestly, there is a different niche for the single stacks and Glock is missing the boat by not entering the market.....

I agree that Glock is leaving easy money on the table by not making a single stack 9mm and .40. Yet...Glock is nothing if not business savvy, so there must be a reason they are not making them. It's possible that Glock has not (yet) found a way to make a small, light pistol that can tolerate the high pressure cartridges while still being reliable enough to carry the "Glock" name?

I also agree that the thinner pistols do make a difference...just that (for me) the difference is not enough to give up the reliability and extra ammo capacity (and magazine compatibility) of the Glock platform.

If I want to throw a smaller gun into my pocket for a trip out into the back yard, I can always borrow my wife's LCP.:wink: