Defensive Carry banner

1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
475 Posts
Read when you posted the link over at SigTalk--a fine review--anyone interested in this rifle should take a look at this review. I purchased the MCX a few weeks ago--great rifle--but I'll leave the writing skills to John.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
203 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Read when you posted the link over at SigTalk--a fine review--anyone interested in this rifle should take a look at this review. I purchased the MCX a few weeks ago--great rifle--but I'll leave the writing skills to John.
Thanks Bob - you're too kind!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
281 Posts
Good review and timely for me since I'm currently debating between the MCX and Tavor X95.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
203 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Good review and timely for me since I'm currently debating between the MCX and Tavor X95.
Can't take anything away from the Tavor - it's a heckuva rifle. But if you have any investment in the AR-15 platform in terms of training time, you might well be better off with the MCX.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
28 Posts
Can't take anything away from the Tavor - it's a heckuva rifle. But if you have any investment in the AR-15 platform in terms of training time, you might well be better off with the MCX.
The Tavor X-95 has the mag release in AR-15 position. Your review seems to only aknowledge the original SAR.

To Candor : Also the Tavor(s) are about 10" shorter than the MCX if close quarters is your thing. So that's about 10" shorter than the MCX with the same size barrel as the MCX. (The Tavor's barrel is 16.5")
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top