Defensive Carry banner

1 - 20 of 41 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,761 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
They already have helped push through the nation's most restrictive firearms law, which Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, D-Conn., signed Thursday.

Now they're trying to do the same in Washington, where gun legislation is facing tough resistance. Congress is returning from spring break, and Newtown, Conn., families plan to spend the coming week on Capitol Hill.

Their goal of their personal appeals is to speak to every senator who has yet to express support for the gun legislation, and to show how the Dec. 14 shooting has affected their lives.
Sandy Hook families bring emotion to gun debate - Houston Chronicle
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
18,168 Posts
And they are scheduled to be on “6o Minutes” after the basketball gang worship.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,761 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,283 Posts
We are at the 80th % of where the Socialists in our Gov't can ride this whole thing, before even the Idiots in the Masses start to question them..............Just Sayin.

Political itdiot Stooges are many, and 3 Stooges captivated many of 'Stooges'. ? A lot of those that walk amungst you, every day, are totall not aware. Be Aware, as they are Zombies................. and hate you.

Disclaimer: I just changed keyboards and it is very painful................
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,421 Posts
What they are really doing is turning the sympathy for their loss into indifference, at least for me anyway. Personally, I feel for them and heir loss, but their attempt to get every American to view it through there eyes is over the top IMO. The loss of a child is horrific and angers everyone, that's a given, but the type of monster that perpetrated the terrible act isn't as wide spread around our nation as some would have folks believe. Sure there are nuts all over the place, but I'm sure there are factors surrounding what perpetuates these types of acts of violence; the media being one of the most prevalent IMO. What some of these folks just don't understand is; I for one will defend my right to defend my family from anyone, just so something like what they have had to endure never happens to my loved ones.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
601 Posts
In contrast to this is a New York Times artcle in my local newspaper today:

Police: Take action during a mass attack

For those of us on this forum the conclusions are what we already knew but surprising still that its being published in the liberal newspapers.

Police: Take action during a mass attack - Worcester Telegram & Gazette - telegram.com

"Research on mass shootings over the past decade has bolstered the idea that people at the scene of an attack have a better chance of survival if they take an active stance rather than waiting to be rescued by the police, who in many cases cannot get there fast enough to prevent the loss of life. "
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,387 Posts
What they are really doing is turning the sympathy for their loss into indifference, at least for me anyway. Personally, I feel for them and heir loss, but their attempt to get every American to view it through there eyes is over the top IMO. The loss of a child is horrific and angers everyone, that's a given, but the type of monster that perpetrated the terrible act isn't as wide spread around our nation as some would have folks believe. Sure there are nuts all over the place, but I'm sure there are factors surrounding what perpetuates these types of acts of violence; the media being one of the most prevalent IMO. What some of these folks just don't understand is; I for one will defend my right to defend my family from anyone, just so something like what they have had to endure never happens to my loved ones.
Very well said, especially the part in bold. I have so much sympathy for these people who have lost the most important thing in their lives. It's unimaginable pain. But, they are coming from a place of pure emotion. No amount of facts, stats or common sense is going to make a dent: Their child was killed by a gun so if you ban guns, no more children will be killed.

How are you going to argue with someone hurting, that there are a lot of other factors involved, without looking like a monster yourself?

The anti's know this and are going to use it to their own advantage...probably for years.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,421 Posts
Very well said, especially the part in bold. I have so much sympathy for these people who have lost the most important thing in their lives. It's unimaginable pain. But, they are coming from a place of pure emotion. No amount of facts, stats or common sense is going to make a dent: Their child was killed by a gun so if you ban guns, no more children will be killed.

How are you going to argue with someone hurting, that there is a lot of other factors involved without looking like a monster yourself?

The anti's know this and are going to use it to their own advantage...probably for years.
Exactly! Thank you for adding that to the conversation, it is spot on IMO and a true reflection of what's happening in regards to the situation.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,993 Posts
Emotion always trumps logic..for a while.
When the emotional synapses of the brain settle down, the thinking man takes over; as it should be.

This concept is well rendered and demonstrated by looking at the Sept 11 attacks.
At first, everybody..and I mean every American was boiling hot. Going to war over something like this was not a question.
Not long after, support for the war effort waned drastically as the memory of 911 began to fade.

I know of no one who does not feel for those who were touched by the Newtown tragedy.
To those who continually open the wound by displaying and (using) those directly involved is nothing short of disgusting.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,578 Posts
What they are really doing is turning the sympathy for their loss into indifference, at least for me anyway.
Don't let it work. Sympathy for their loss is a good thing. Indifference is not. Hold on to that sympathy, and endeavour to reduce the likelihood that something like will happen again. Proactively. Not the same way they are, but you don't believe their efforts will help anyway. So, we need more people trying to actually help.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,421 Posts
Don't let it work. Sympathy for their loss is a good thing. Indifference is not. Hold on to that sympathy, and endeavour to reduce the likelihood that something like will happen again. Proactively. Not the same way they are, but you don't believe their efforts will help anyway. So, we need more people trying to actually help.
I understand what you are saying and for the most part I can understand where you are coming from.. My problem is when these poor souls start allowing themselves to be used as pawns to help forward a party's agenda, that's where the indifference starts to set in. The indifference comes naturally and is the fault, first and foremost the individuals taking advantage of the grief stricken parents. At some point though, the parents must realize that they are being manipulated and make a stand for what's morally right. Helping the wackos try to strip honest Americans of their God given rights to self defense and the tools used for that purpose is not, nor should it be their mission. thats just IMO of course, but also my opinion, it's certainly not the way to honer them. They are all victims of the shooting and so are millions of other Americans as well. We all feel the sorrow and pain for their loss, but on a much smaller scale. IMO, they should take the time to grieve for their losses and tell the media to get the hell outta their personal lives and allow the healing to begin and stop trying to dramatize these types of horrific crimes agains humanity. For those who would say, "But they have to cover it, it's the news". I say that's fine, but everytime I hear um say,"we were the first to bring you coverage of the story" I want to reach through the TV and choke the pooh outta someone responsible for that statement.

Anyway... Sorry, for the rant, but that's how I feel on the subject. I appreciate and respect your thoughts on the matter.. :bier:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,710 Posts
Are any of the Newtown parent-victims in favor of armed security and against the nonsensical legislation passed in CT? Are any NRA members? If so we will not likely here their story!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,578 Posts
Anyway... Sorry, for the rant, but that's how I feel on the subject. I appreciate and respect your thoughts on the matter.. :bier:
I totally agree where the blame lies for the hardening of your heart. I'm just asking that you not let it happen, and that we all keep on struggling to reduce the likelihood of future incidents in ways that we find morally acceptable. Cheers.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,304 Posts
I am not the most empathetic of individuals to begin with. People lose loved ones every day and these people's loss, though through horrific circumstances, is no greater than the loss felt by many others routinely. The sympathy that I have for these families ended when they started using it as an excuse to push an agenda upon me and is starting to turn towards animosity.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,614 Posts
It clearly shows us exactly what kind of people we have for leaders in this country. When they will use any opportunity, especially a tragic event like the Sandy Hook shooting to further their political ambitions. They play on people's emotions to get them to react in a knee-jerk fashion to trade their freedoms for some imaginary security. The name of the game is to divide and conquer, play one group against the other. Our liberal leaders gleefully used this horrendous crime which incidentally came at the perfect point in time to wage their war against personal freedom. I am sure that if this incident never occurred that the people in power would have created one. As proof we only need to go back as far as the "Fast and Furious"campaign, which incidentally would have worked perfectly to incite the response they desire, but alas someone spilled the beans. It kind of makes you wonder how many similar types of schemes that were perpetrated that we didn't hear about.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
643 Posts
As a victim of a violent gun crime myself, I wish someone, anyone, would gather a group of us on the pro side to speak out, and I really dont understand why this hasn't happened. individuals, sure, but no prominent groups.

I feel for their suffering, and loss, but that's about where they and I part on things. I refuse to give up my freedoms in exchange for perceived security, and emotionally based attempts to gain security. This folks should focus there energies on fixings root causes for violent crimes, from single victim shootings to mass murders, rather then work on things that will have 0 effect on occurrences.

Malevolence does not care about laws, rules, regulations, or feelings and emotions.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
19,904 Posts
What's particularly disturbing to me is that legislation is created out of emotion and not clear, rational thinking. It's probably the technical side of me that expects others to base decisions on fact and not emotion. For example, our government spent our tax dollars to fund three separate studies which showed that the 1994 AWB had no measurable effect on crime - yet we want to reinstate it?

Jeff Snyder, author of "A Nation of Cowards," wrote: "But to ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow. ...society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,672 Posts
It is a shame that in their time of mourning, the progressive media and legislators feed upon the grief of manipulatable, naïve victims. Show me one law that would have prevented the murder of their children, and I will support it 100%.

Background check- Ann Lanza passed one. Son, Adam, needed no background check to take his mother's firearms and kill her.

"Hi-cap" magazines- it is disgusting to suggest that having a killer reload more is a solution, or would "save just one child". Police didn't arrive until we'll after he liked himself.

"Assault weapons" ban- let's assume we're dealing with a criminal who won't steal or illegally purchase this rifle. We'll ignore that semi auto pistols are used in many more crimes than sporting rifles. We'll ignore that pistol grips, "barrel shrouds", and bayonet lugs are cosmetic, and have no impact on the function or lethality of a firearm (o.k. maybe bayonet lugs, but how many children were killed by fixed bayonet?). A Ruger mini 14 is not on the list, but functions exactl the same as rifles on the banned list.

Gun registration- Ann Lanza's guns were registered. She had a permit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,444 Posts
The 60 Minutes article has passed and I find no new sadness or shame to bear. I will continue to argue against the sinister minds, whatever the sadness and shame that we share.

I am an armed and dangerous and just man and I stand to commit just violence within the law when called for. I harbor the heart and soul of Civilization and I will argue to keep it that way.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,181 Posts
It clearly shows us exactly what kind of people we have for leaders in this country. When they will use any opportunity, especially a tragic event like the Sandy Hook shooting to further their political ambitions. They play on people's emotions to get them to react in a knee-jerk fashion to trade their freedoms for some imaginary security. The name of the game is to divide and conquer, play one group against the other. Our liberal leaders gleefully used this horrendous crime which incidentally came at the perfect point in time to wage their war against personal freedom. I am sure that if this incident never occurred that the people in power would have created one. As proof we only need to go back as far as the "Fast and Furious"campaign, which incidentally would have worked perfectly to incite the response they desire, but alas someone spilled the beans. It kind of makes you wonder how many similar types of schemes that were perpetrated that we didn't hear about.
I agree 100%. But since the media is just a propoganda arm of the lib's you'll never see the other side of the story. Families saved by the use of defensive weapons. Its sad to see the vast number of Americans that are uneducated sheep and follow along blindly even when it's been proven that their " leaders" are shameless liars. Whats worse is a good number of them are quite capable of discovering the facts but they don't want to know. They seem to take a perverse satisfaction in seeing people lose their rights so long as it's not themselves.

The taxation without representation and tyrannical government that prompted our separation from the British is back in full force. And the natives are restless, which is probably creating some sleepness nights for those who still have a voice in government. I personally think that is one of the primary drivers behind the disarmament agenda
 
1 - 20 of 41 Posts
Top