Joined
·
42 Posts
SECOND AMENDMENT - What do you think?
- Status
1 - 20 of 101 Posts
Joined
·
1,274 Posts
Uugh. Makes us all look like morons, even if he WAS within his rights.
TGO's favorite Village Idiot is at it again... - Tennessee Gun Owners
TGO's favorite Village Idiot is at it again... - Tennessee Gun Owners
Joined
·
6,539 Posts
No, I don't think so...we here in Tennessee know him from several other boards from which he has also been banned (the number grows constantly). He is simply a very immature "adult." :sigh:
Or, it is over the top and could lead greater restrictions.
Just because it is legal does not make it a good idea.
Joined
·
7,524 Posts
Bingo. Makes a case for those who would like to portray us as dangerous and crazy. People like this are not simply exercising a right, they are jeopardizing our rights by adding fuel to the anti gun arguments.
Joined
·
6,539 Posts
I suspect you did not do so in the same manner he did. We didn't read about your doing so in the news, did we? :smile:
Your point is well taken, but those of us who know him from several other boards are not surprised that he did this, and we will not be surprised (but will likely be chagrined) by the next stunt he pulls. And believe me, this was a stunt. :tired:
No it doesn't make you a nut, but to the Anti's it might appear as such and those anti's do vote.
While both may be legal and both may not present a threat, there could well be a different perception of someone with a holstered handgun and someone with a rifle or shotgun in their hands. (or on their shoulder)
Joined
·
18,279 Posts
Dec 24, 8:47 AM EST
Man with AK-47-style gun in park detained, let go
By TRAVIS LOLLER
Associated Press Writer
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) -- A man carrying an AK-47-style semiautomatic pistol was detained at Radnor Lake State Park on Sunday after startled hikers complained to park rangers.
Ellen Thomas told WSMV-TV she was hiking an upper trail when she encountered 37-year-old Leonard Embody wearing a camouflage jacket, military boots and a black skull cap. She called the encounter "scary."
State Department of Environment and Conservation spokeswoman Tisha Calabrese-Benton said Embody was detained by park rangers because his weapon looked like a rifle.
After the gun was secured and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives personnel were called, Embody was released without charges because he has a handgun carry permit.
Calabrese-Benton said the gun had no stock and the barrel was under 11 inches, however state attorneys are still investigating whether the AK-47-style pistol, with a 30-round magazine, is legal to carry as a handgun.
The state legislature passed a law earlier this year allowing people with handgun permits to carry their weapons in parks.
John Pierce is a co-founder of OpenCarry.org, a group that seeks to normalize the open carry of "properly holstered handguns" as people go about their lives.
"On a fundamental level, I don't think he did anything wrong," Pierce said of Embody, "but politically that might not be best thing to do and it's not something we're advocating for."
Pierce said wearing camouflage also perpetuates an unhelpful stereotype.
Pierce said he lived in Bristol, Va., for years, right on Tennessee border. He said he has openly carried a holstered, normal-sized handgun in Tennessee numerous times and never had anyone complain about it.
Lets anlyze this article a bit before I blow some of these ridiculously misinformed comments out of the water.
Weak minded people only exist because of people better than them. Weak people do not make change.
Wearing camoflage? You've got to be kidding. Go to any town in the South during deer season and you'll see more people wearing camoflage than not.
Man with AK-47-style gun in park detained, let go
By TRAVIS LOLLER
Associated Press Writer
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) -- A man carrying an AK-47-style semiautomatic pistol was detained at Radnor Lake State Park on Sunday after startled hikers complained to park rangers.
Ellen Thomas told WSMV-TV she was hiking an upper trail when she encountered 37-year-old Leonard Embody wearing a camouflage jacket, military boots and a black skull cap. She called the encounter "scary."
State Department of Environment and Conservation spokeswoman Tisha Calabrese-Benton said Embody was detained by park rangers because his weapon looked like a rifle.
After the gun was secured and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives personnel were called, Embody was released without charges because he has a handgun carry permit.
Calabrese-Benton said the gun had no stock and the barrel was under 11 inches, however state attorneys are still investigating whether the AK-47-style pistol, with a 30-round magazine, is legal to carry as a handgun.
The state legislature passed a law earlier this year allowing people with handgun permits to carry their weapons in parks.
John Pierce is a co-founder of OpenCarry.org, a group that seeks to normalize the open carry of "properly holstered handguns" as people go about their lives.
"On a fundamental level, I don't think he did anything wrong," Pierce said of Embody, "but politically that might not be best thing to do and it's not something we're advocating for."
Pierce said wearing camouflage also perpetuates an unhelpful stereotype.
Pierce said he lived in Bristol, Va., for years, right on Tennessee border. He said he has openly carried a holstered, normal-sized handgun in Tennessee numerous times and never had anyone complain about it.
Lets anlyze this article a bit before I blow some of these ridiculously misinformed comments out of the water.
I guess the fact that it was hunting season, possibly even deer season my have been lost on them.
Hmmm. Somebody ignorant of the law is scared. So what? The burden of proof is on them, not the bearer of the scary,evil looking AK.
Duh. Detained for carrying a gun. Great. Detained become someone thought it was scary.
Released without charges. Of course. He was carrying a legal pistol, not much different than carrying a AR pistol. No stock, a barrel length that dosent exceed 16 inches. The ATF checked it, it was good to go, and they released him,further proof that what he was doing was legal.
More clueless people. The ATF released him. If the ATF would have thought for a second that the man violated ANY state laws, they would have called the local authorities. They did not. They check for violations of both State and Federal law. Its the very reason that ATF has agents in each state.Those agents are familiar with state law.
Here is what the sheep generally dont understand. If there is no law prohibiting someone carrying an AK handgun, then it is legal.
I personally dont give a rip about what someone elses thinks of my activity. If its legal, they have no say. If they are scared, that is their problem, not mine.
Weak minded people only exist because of people better than them. Weak people do not make change.
Wearing camoflage? You've got to be kidding. Go to any town in the South during deer season and you'll see more people wearing camoflage than not.
Joined
·
18,279 Posts
In your opinion. That sort of mindset is exactly why some people perceive it as an issue.
He was within his rights.
He was legal.
Nope. Read the article. The man is active in the open carry movement. At least he has the stones to do it. Maybe when more people pick up on and exercise that right, people will quit being scared.
Thats what Rosa Parks was told by some of her "folks". Just sit in the back and be quiet. Don't make any waves. How does it look to everyone else. She heard it all.
Because she had the courage to act, things changed.
"immature adult"?. Not hardly. The man knew exactly what he was doing.
I haven't. Unlike some here that haven't figured it out yet.
Theres that former anti-gun northern mentality again. It "could" lead to greater restrictions. You "could" get run over by a concrete truck when crossing the road. Will that keep you from crossing the road? Why is this any different?
.
It worked.
History is not changed by sitting at the house typing on a BB. It's changed by getting up and doing something.
It made it to the national news. A few dozen men shooting at the most powerful army in the world in the state of Massachusetts was called a "stunt" by the British."
Stunts are made to get attention. His worked well. He did it with a legal handgun. He did it open carrying. Legally.
The Brady Bunch thinks we are all idiots for carrying guns. This wont change a thing.
.
If we worried about how Anti's voted we would have lost the right to own a gun long before now. I don't worry about or care what they think. Why do you?
There is a different perception. He has an evil looking AK pistol. OH MY GOD.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Gun-owners are our own worst enemies. Like the general population, they aren't smart enough to realize if we don't quit the petty differences and hold the ground against ANY infringement, eventually we wont have to worry about it.
What the man doing was legal.
If we don't get on the OFFENSE and quit playing DEFENSE, just how are we supposed to WIN?
Why should we have to defend a legal activity?
Joined
·
356 Posts
Personally, I believe that, if anything, Mr. Pierce did more damage than Mr. Embody...and I so stated in response to Mr. Pierce on his forum.
As a "spokesman" for the OC "movement", he played into the antis idea that, if exercising a right frightens anyone who does not understand it, then that right either should not exist or should not be exercised.
As a "spokesman" for the OC "movement", he played into the antis idea that, if exercising a right frightens anyone who does not understand it, then that right either should not exist or should not be exercised.
Joined
·
18,279 Posts
As a "spokesman" for the OC "movement", he played into the antis idea that, if exercising a right frightens anyone who does not understand it, then that right either should not exist or should not be exercised.
Which of course, is completly wrong.
Why should we cater to the ignorant?
Progress is not made by doing so.
When you fight a battle, you use the ignorance of the enemy to your advantage, you exploit it and use it make gains.
We are in a battle, but its not just with the anti's. The battle is as much with people that call themselves "progun",but havent thought about the issue in depth, because they still dont see the big picture. The big picture is not hard to see, in fact it is suprisingly simple.
The anti's dont want you to own a gun...period.
Which of course, is completly wrong.
Why should we cater to the ignorant?
Progress is not made by doing so.
When you fight a battle, you use the ignorance of the enemy to your advantage, you exploit it and use it make gains.
We are in a battle, but its not just with the anti's. The battle is as much with people that call themselves "progun",but havent thought about the issue in depth, because they still dont see the big picture. The big picture is not hard to see, in fact it is suprisingly simple.
The anti's dont want you to own a gun...period.
Joined
·
6,539 Posts
"Knowing what you are doing" in no way disqualifies one to be immature. :smile:
Joined
·
7,524 Posts
We may not like it but the fact remains that losing in the court of public opinion means losing the support of the voting citizenry which, again, whether we like it or not, is important for the preservation of our rights. Clowns who run around flashing their weaponry and their tactical gear for effect may think they are exercising their rights but in fact are making us all look stupid. If they feel they are helping our cause by exercising their rights, I would appeal to them not to do so on my behalf. We should all exercise our rights but in a manner that doesn't alienate us as a bunch of mall ninjas.
Joined
·
866 Posts
Just because you can do it doesn't mean that you should do it. I've run across a lot of people OC'ing in the woods but with a side arm. The pistols they carried looked like a tool and were not out of place. If I had seen this guy in the woods, I would have been concerned. What did he hope to gain by dressing in military type garb with an AK pistol? Isn't the point of this forum to discuss conceal carry and ways to defend you and yours? It doesn't help our cause and gives ammo to those that would deny us the right to own, much less carry a weapon for our protection. No good can come of this "immature" display.
Joined
·
1,207 Posts
For some, it was not the style of weapon he carried that was the problem. He used a sling, as one would do with a rifle, and slung it over his shoulder, then on his return walk, he put it on his front. Also, he admitted that he had painted the tip of the firearm orange in order to make others, including law enforcement believe that the firearm was not real. He has posted about wanting to get a silencer for the gun and also armor penetrating bullets.
I read the above, in post from Mr. Embody. It was on opencarry.com (or is it org) website in the message boards.
I read the above, in post from Mr. Embody. It was on opencarry.com (or is it org) website in the message boards.
It isn't illegal to carry a handgun on a sling.
It isn't illegal to paint the tip of a firearm or any part of one.
It isn't illegal to own, use, or sell AP if you're a private individual.
It isn't illegal to purchase a silencer if you fill out a form 4 and are approved by ATF, and approved by your CLEO and buy it from a class III dealer.
1 - 20 of 101 Posts
- Status
Join the discussion
