Yeah, the democrats don't understand "compromise" at all. They would rather everyone suffer than to compromise on anything.The only way this would happen is if the filibuster was gotten rid of and Republicans had control of the WH and congress. If not, it will take a deal with Democrats to make it happen. This is what happened with hearing protection act. Republicans in the senate didn't have the votes to end any filibuster that would have came about. The Democrats wouldn't take a deal that would ban "assault rifles" (not advocating this) in exchange for allowing reciprocity. They only want to take away gun rights, not expand them in anyway. Any "deal" would be them getting pretty much everything they want, which isn't a deal.
You're probably correct.Didn't happen when they had control of everything, isn't going to happen now or in the near future.
He stood before the NRA convention and promised the abolition of gun free zones on military bases by executive order on the day after the inauguration. Thirty-some executive orders signed shortly thereafter, not one of them dealing with firearms. Yeah, I know he is better than the other option, but that doesn't make his word any better when it comes to guns.You're probably correct.
However, every Administration has "must-do's" and priority lists. Personally, I never thought that National Reciprocity would get signed in the first 2 years of Trump Administration.
Then when Pelosi got control of the House, all hope had to be abandoned.
Trump has done far better at actually keeping campaign promises than any other President in my lifetime.
I don't hold it against him for not getting National Reciprocity done yet.
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk