Defensive Carry banner

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
441 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I know that this has been in place for a really long time, but I have never heard it put this way before. This is taken from Bullet Glossary

FMJ: full-metal jacket

Military round specified by Geneva Convention. Metal surrounds lead or steel core to prevent additional mushrooming of bullet, which may cause inhumane wounding. Usually has lead-exposed base.
Umm, isn't war about killing? I personally think war is insane, but this just seems quite odd, to be concerned about hurting someone you are trying to kill?
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
21,349 Posts
It's actually from the Hague Convention, not the Geneva Convention.... but yeah, it's silly.

The Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III, prohibits the use in warfare of bullets that easily expand or flatten in the body.[4] This is often incorrectly believed to be prohibited in the Geneva Conventions, but it significantly predates those conventions, and is in fact a continuance of the St. Petersburg Declaration of 1868, which banned exploding projectiles of less than 400 grams, as well as weapons designed to aggravate injured soldiers or make their death inevitable. NATO members do not use small arms ammunition that is prohibited by the Hague Convention.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,517 Posts
The point wasn't about humane or inhumane. Not really. That is just a smokescreen. If a man is killed in battle so be it, wound a man and it ties up many more of his comrads.
Think of all the resources necessary behind the lines. There is more than one way to win a war. Also when the wounded start returning home think of the damage to moral.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,104 Posts
Makes as much sense as sterilizing the needle before giving an inmate a lethal injection, don't it? :confused:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
203 Posts
My father suggested that the FMJ can actually be more beneficial in war.

When you get shot with the FMJ, it's less lethal than the JHP. Consequently, treating you ends up taking more time and resources than if you were simply killed by a JHP.

Anything that slows down your enemy is supposedly beneficial in war...

so is this true?
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
21,349 Posts
My father suggested that the FMJ can actually be more beneficial in war.

When you get shot with the FMJ, it's less lethal than the JHP. Consequently, treating you ends up taking more time and resources than if you were simply killed by a JHP.

Anything that slows down your enemy is supposedly beneficial in war...

so is this true?
It used to be, but Haji don't have medics and his buds don't care that he's hit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
203 Posts
So basically we're shooting terrorists who are only incapacitated long enough that when our soldiers walk up to them, they are alive enough to detonate a grenade for their "last hurrah."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
218 Posts
Is this why the special rounds the private operators were testing in Iraq, that killed the guy shot in the butt, stirred up so much trouble?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,421 Posts
The point wasn't about humane or inhumane. Not really. That is just a smokescreen. If a man is killed in battle so be it, wound a man and it ties up many more of his comrads.
Think of all the resources necessary behind the lines. There is more than one way to win a war. Also when the wounded start returning home think of the damage to moral.
:hand10: Excellent points.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
10,458 Posts
JD, in one theater you are correct about the lack of medical care or taking away their dead/wounded buddies, the other one, not so much.

Nova, thats why we train to hit vital areas, and to hit our target until the threat is done. There are precautions I won't go into here on how to approach an enemy that has been shot.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,103 Posts
In addition to the legal issues, the military likes FMJ because it feeds better, and because it penetrates cover better than an expanding bullet.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,416 Posts
That's why .50BMG is a nice round to use for snipers. It's FMJ, but the velocity and the weight it has as it passes through the enemy is pretty devistating.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
480 Posts
Umm, isn't war about killing? I personally think war is insane, but this just seems quite odd, to be concerned about hurting someone you are trying to kill?
Getting into ballistics and what is and isn't inhumane, or which bullet kills better than the other is a never ending debate. Except For Ending Slavery, Fascism, Nazism, and Communism, WAR has Never Solved Anything. War may be hell, but IMO, far from insane.

____________________________
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Anyone Who Threatens It.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,078 Posts
The Russians have found ways around the Hague Convention:

The Russian military issue 5N7-specification 5.45mm bullets are a somewhat complex full metal jacket design. The 56 gr (3.6 g) boattail projectile has a gilding-metal-clad jacket. The unhardened steel core is covered by a thin lead coating which does not fill the entire point end, leaving a hollow cavity inside the nose. The bullet is cut to length during the manufacturing process to give the correct weight. The base of the bullet is tapered to reduce drag and there is a small lead plug crimped in place in the base of the bullet.

The lead plug, in combination with the air space at the point of the bullet, has the effect of moving the bullet's center of gravity to the rear; the hollow air space also makes the bullet's point prone to deformation when the bullet strikes anything solid, inducing yaw. The brown-lacquered steel case is Berdan-primed. Its 39.37 mm (1.55 in) length makes it slightly longer than the 7.62x39mm case which measures exactly 38.60 mm (1.52 in). The primer has a copper cup and is sealed with a heavy red lacquer. The propellant charge is a ball powder with similar burning characteristics to the WC 844 powder used in 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition.

The 50 gr (3.2 g) tracer projectile has a shorter ogival profile and is green-tipped. The amount of igniter material provides for a burn of up to 800 m.

5.45x39mm 5N7 Cartridge Sectional Drawing
A: projectile jacket
B: steel core
C: hollow point
D: lead inlay
E: propelling charge

5.45x39mm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,531 Posts
The Russians have found ways around the Hague Convention:




5.45x39mm 5N7 Cartridge Sectional Drawing
A: projectile jacket
B: steel core
C: hollow point
D: lead inlay
E: propelling charge

5.45x39mm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So has the US--we call it OTM (Open Tip Match).

Since the round isn't designed to expand and cause "more suffering", it's technically legal.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,103 Posts
The Afghans called that the "poison bullet" when they were fighting the Soviets.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
33 Posts
:thinking: Say what?

Never mind, I just looked it up....Personally I think that one shot the butt is BS, but yeah that's why they were PO'd. Too bad for them.
I don't know the story, but a bullet shot in the butt that hits the femoral artery would kill very quickly. This would work with any bullet.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
94 Posts
again i find myself wanting to say i agree with buckeye and Mr. Buckeye you are correct
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top