Defensive Carry banner

1 - 20 of 57 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
72 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I live in a small town and own a barber shop. I'm the only barber in the shop. We've had 3 armed robberies (2 with gun, 1 with knife) in the last 6 weeks. I've been debating what I would do if someone tried to rob me at gun point.
Do I shoot them, or give them a chance to retreat first? If they had a knife I'd definitely give them a chance to drop it. Just wondering what everyone would do in that situation?
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
143,670 Posts
Do I shoot them, or give them a chance to retreat first?

You mean..."Do I shoot them or give them a chance to shoot me first?" :confused:

You shoot them first & when they fall to the floor that is when you stop shooting them. :yup:

And if somebody busts in and attempts to rob you with a knife....you shoot them also. :yup:

I won't post any photos here but search Google for "knife wound" and then click on images to see knife wound photos.

You do not want to give some highed up criminal looking for drug money a chance to do that to you. :nono:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,390 Posts
...if I were in Indiana, I'd look up and be very familiar with INs deadly force laws...and what the penal code or equivalent there says constitutes a robbery, an armed robbery...etc...

...without any law to compare your whatifs to, we're all just giving you advice...may be good, may be directly against IN law...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,338 Posts
Most barber shops are not that big if bg comes in with knife and is within 10 ft I would shoot. It takes a sec for him to lunge at you. Forget the articile but its called within 21 feet guy with knife has advantage, dont risk it.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,465 Posts
Hesitating could get you killed. You should view a knife the same that you would a gun if they're in the same room with you. Even if you shoot them, they can still be on top of you, carving you into ribbons.

I take presentation of lethal force from a criminal who's threatening to use it very seriously. I'd be shooting him to the ground.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
140 Posts
I can't remember the name of the drill, but its eye opening.

Basically, a man with a knife can cover 21 feet and stab you before you can get your gun on target.

Someone robbing you with a knife is just as much a threat to your life as someone robbing you with a gun.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,343 Posts
Check the laws. Get someone else to be in the shop with you, doesn't have to be a barber.

Set up video surveillance so you can prove the legality of the shoot.

Lock the door between customers and when you are engaged. Put up a sign 'Door lock broken, knock or ring to be admitted'. (IOW don't say 'due to robberies', lol.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
143,670 Posts
Indiana Code IC 35-41-3-2 & IC 35-41-3-3
IC 35-41-3-2
Use of force to protect person or property
Sec. 2. (a) A person is justified in using reasonable force against another person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person:
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
if the person reasonably believes that that force is necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony. No person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary.
(b) A person:
(1) is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, against another person; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or terminate the other person’s unlawful entry of or attack on the person’s dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle.
(c) With respect to property other than a dwelling, curtilage, or an occupied motor vehicle, a person is justified in using reasonable force against another person if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to immediately prevent or terminate the other person’s trespass on or criminal interference with property lawfully in the person’s possession, lawfully in possession of a member of the person’s immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property the person has authority to protect. However, a person:
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
only if that force is justified under subsection (a).
(d) A person is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, against another person and does not have a duty to retreat if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or stop the other person from hijacking, attempting to hijack, or otherwise seizing or attempting to seize unlawful control of an aircraft in flight. For purposes of this subsection, an aircraft is considered to be in flight while the aircraft is:
(1) on the ground in Indiana:
(A) after the doors of the aircraft are closed for takeoff; and (B) until the aircraft takes off;
(2) in the airspace above Indiana; or
(3) on the ground in Indiana:
(A) after the aircraft lands; and
(B) before the doors of the aircraft are opened after landing.
(e) Notwithstanding subsections (a), (b), and (c), a person is not justified in using force if:
(1) the person is committing or is escaping after the commission of a crime;
(2) the person provokes unlawful action by another person with intent to cause bodily injury to the other person; or
(3) the person has entered into combat with another person or is the initial aggressor unless the person withdraws from the encounter and communicates to the other person the intent to do so and the other person nevertheless continues or threatens to continue unlawful action.
(f) Notwithstanding subsection (d), a person is not justified in using force if the person:
(1) is committing, or is escaping after the commission of, a crime;
(2) provokes unlawful action by another person, with intent to cause bodily injury to the other person; or
(3) continues to combat another person after the other person withdraws from the encounter and communicates the other person’s intent to stop hijacking,
attempting to hijack, or otherwise seizing or attempting to seize unlawful control of an aircraft in flight.
As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.8; Acts 1979, P.L.297, SEC.1; P.L.59-2002, SEC.1; P.L.189-2006, SEC.1.
IC 35-41-3-3
Use of force relating to arrest or escape
Sec. 3. (a) A person other than a law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force against another person to effect an arrest or prevent the other person’s escape if:
(1) a felony has been committed; and
(2) there is probable cause to believe the other person committed that felony.
However, such a person is not justified in using deadly force unless that force is justified under section 2 of this chapter.
(b) A law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force if the officer reasonably believes that the force is necessary to effect a lawful arrest. However, an officer is justified in using deadly force only if the officer:
(1) has probable cause to believe that that deadly force is necessary:
(A) to prevent the commission of a forcible felony; or
(B) to effect an arrest of a person who the officer has probable cause to believe poses a threat of serious bodily injury to the officer or a third person; and
(2) has given a warning, if feasible, to the person against whom the deadly force is to be used.
(c) A law enforcement officer making an arrest under an invalid warrant is justified in using force as if the warrant was valid, unless the officer knows that the warrant is invalid.
(d) A law enforcement officer who has an arrested person in custody is justified in using the same force to prevent the escape of the arrested person from custody that the officer would be justified in using if the officer was arresting that person. However, an officer is justified in using deadly force only if the officer:
(1) has probable cause to believe that deadly force is necessary to prevent the escape from custody of a person who the officer has probable cause to believe poses a threat of serious bodily injury to the officer or a third person; and
(2) has given a warning, if feasible, to the person against whom the deadly force is to be used.
(e) A guard or other official in a penal facility or a law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, if the officer has probable cause to believe that the force is necessary to prevent the escape of a person who is detained in the penal facility.
(f) Notwithstanding subsection (b), (d), or (e), a law enforcement officer who is a defendant in a criminal prosecution has the same right as a person who is not a law enforcement officer to assert self-defense under IC 35-41-3-2.
As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.9; Acts 1979, P.L.297, SEC.2; P.L.245-1993, SEC.1.



 

·
Registered
Joined
·
289 Posts
As you describe it, capability and intent are there. I would certainly not hesitate to draw, whether I actually shoot would depend on a the situation. Does the BG respond to the presentation of the weapon and GTFO? Maybe that's all it takes. Not to degrade the thread into another discussion of whether you only draw with intent to fire, but I'll say I can see situations where you draw but ultimately don't have to shoot. Guy comes in the door with a knife talking smack, I draw my ccw, he stops short and slowly backs to the door and runs out. I then reholster and call the cops. Alternatively, if he is coming at me quickly and I don't have time to delay without risking my life, then I shoot without question.

Now, I say that from the standpoint that it's really just a thought experiment as I sit here. Lord only knows how I'd react if the situation actually arose. Thankfully it's threads like this that at least allow us to think them through.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,465 Posts
...
Now, I say that from the standpoint that it's really just a thought experiment as I sit here. Lord only knows how I'd react if the situation actually arose. Thankfully it's threads like this that at least allow us to think them through.
Words of wisdom there. I reinforce a planned violent reaction my part in hopes of preparing myself to do so if needed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
36,930 Posts
Unless you can duck a speeding bullet, shoot first! Knife or gun, it's "armed robbery."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
414 Posts
I would condition myself to fire absolute lethal shots the very moment a real weapon is visible anywhere in a room size space. 1.5 seconds to cross a room with a knife and run it through your chest. I'd bet money under stress you cannot draw from concealment and accurately fire on a moving target that fast. Much less actually stop the attack. I would guess that if I was a criminal or nut case hell bent on killing you I could enter that shop and kill you with a knife from all the way across the room before you could stop me. Sure I might get shot but I could keep on coming. Keep this in mind. If a persons desire to not kill anyone exceeds their will to fight they will probably not survive. Based on other posts I practice often drawing to low ready with my finger down the frame. Another idea. Ever thought of buying a big duty dog to live in the shop? That might be an idea. Make sure you have some security cameras and DVR and your front and back doors signal on any entry. I'd be practicing your draw and dry firing at least 4-5 times a week until you are lightning fast and muscle memory is perfect. I would also pace off the distances for every important shot you have to make in that space and practice head shots at those distances to hone your accuracy and speed. Honestly your biggest issue might be other customers in the crossfire. I wish you the best. If it were my shop I'd be defending the crap out of it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
821 Posts
If you feel your life is in danger you are justified in stopping the threat by whatever means you choose.
THIS ^^^^^^ is the simple answer! Let ME ask a question back. Why do you carry or want to carry a gun if you don't have a good feel of a situation that could require it? As was said elsewhere, knife, gun -- what's the difference? Dead is dead. :confused:
 
1 - 20 of 57 Posts
Top