Defensive Carry banner
1 - 6 of 19 Posts

Super Moderator
Joined
14,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have to admit that I am a Sig man - I think the Sig 226 may be the most reliable fighting handgun ever made. But, about 4 or 5 months ago, I bought an H&K USP in 9mm and it's really starting to grow on me.

The trigger is just a bit gritty and heavy in DA. I replaced the stock hammer spring with a Wolfe reduced power spring; I think I went from 16# (stock) to 14#. This was against the advice of Wofe Gunsprings for a carry gun I should add. But, I shoot about 200 rounds a week and fire a magazine of my carry ammo anytime I make a change to the gun and fire about a box of carry ammo about once a month, just to be sure. The reduced hammer spring made a significant difference; it's not a match trigger job by any means but it did reduce the DA trigger pull.

I think the SA trigger is wonderful! It's short, crisp, smooth, and breaks at 4.25#. But if that were all there was, I wouldn't be much impressed; my Sigs are all that and more. But I began to notice things about the USP. Like after a reload, the slide barely has to be moved to release the slide lock and chamber a round. Again, not a biggy, but different enough to catch my notice of it.

Then there's the mag release, first, it's fully ambidextrious. Second it's weird, but once I got used to it, my other guns seemed, well, awkward. You know how you have to change your grip to reach the mag release with your thumb on many guns? Not so with the USP; you just have to move your trigger finger to the rear of trigger and press down on the mag release - it works! I have to admit I like it much better than the conventional thumb buttons.

I'm usually not big on safeties, but the USP safety/decocker thingy, adds a lot of versatility, at least for me. I can carry the gun in DA/SA with the safety on or off - my preference. I can carry the gun cocked and locked with the safety on just like a 1911. In fact, the thumb safety is in the same place and orientation as a 1911. If I need to take the the gun out of the holster for administrative duties, like going to the bathroom, I can engage the safety, remove the gun and it's just an added precaution. The same is true if I need to take the gun out of the holster in the car, say to go into a post office or anyplace where the gun is inappropriate. I can engage the safety, remove the gun from the holster, place it under the seat or in the glove box without worrying about the trigger hanging on something and...

The gun looks big, but seems to carry small. The grip fits my hand comfortably and the USP is light. Including empty magazines in each gun, the USP is only 2.8 oz heavier than a gen 2 Glock 17, 4.5 oz lighter than a Sig 226, and 4.2 oz lighter than a Sig 229. I suspect if I could have compared the USP to a gen 3 Glock 17, the weights would be even closer.

Slide/frame widths: G-17 = 1.15" (The frame is actually wider than the slide), Sig 229 = 1.12", Sig 226 = 1.0", USP = 1.134". So, the USP slide is only 0.016" wider than a G-17!

Grip widths: G-17 = 1.16", Sig 226 = 1.31, Sig 229 = 1.25, USP = 1.21. So the USP's grip is only 0.05" wider than the G-17. That's less than a sixteenth of an inch.

Overall dimensions: the G-17, Sig 226, and USP are essentially the same size.

So the USP isn't such a big gun as you may think! I know it sure carrys good, being so light. And of course it conceals just as well as a G-17, Sig 226, or 1911.

One downside of the gun is that stupid accessory rail that none of the Picatinny stuff will fit. That's a real disappointment on such an otherwise fine gun. And, the mags are kinda big, but then I think Glock mags are wide too and the USP mags are only 0.03" wider than a Glock mag.

Most importantly by far, the USP has been 100% reliable. And far FUNNER than I ever imagined. I got all the confidence in the world in this gun.
 

Super Moderator
Joined
14,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
QKShooter said:
...One small suggestion: There are usually better ways to smooth out & degrit a yukky DA pull than to go "Way Light" on the hammer spring...
Good advice of course, but I didn't go way light; I went from 16# to 14#, which is only a 14% change.

USP45 said:
...the USP was initially designed so when you did a mag change slamming a new mag in would release the slide.I can duplicate this on my USP 45 and prefer this,although reading at HKPRO boards it was re-designed to be "less likely" to do this.
My P2000 will "slam" release the slide every time and it doesn't require that much force on the magazine. I love the feature! I cannot get my USP to do that; apparently, as you say, they designed that out. That's too bad - it's a great feature I think.
P95Carry said:
...Thus far tho my 226 ST still fills the roll of my ideal carry...
I'd agree on that! Some think it's a bit heavy, but so is a gov. model 1911 and "everybody" carries them.

I have a 226 ST and feel the same way you do about it, but sometimes I get the urge to try something different and that usually puts me in constant conflict over what to carry. I'll stand by my statement in my opening post, "I think the Sig 226 may be the most reliable fighting handgun ever made." And, the ST version may be the best of the best. But it seems to me that the H&K USP is a close second.

BTW, if you carry a Sig 226ST how come the handle, P95Carry? P95 is a Ruger isn't it?

Tom357 said:
...Then they came out with the P226ST. I couldn't resist. Now that you've got me thinking, though, I may have to go down to the range and rent a USP...
As you can see from my response above, I don't think you can beat, heck I don't think you can even tie, the 226ST as the best fighting gun in the world. But for me, there's lots to like about the USP and Sig and USP were tops in the ICE tests. If you rent a USP, the DA trigger is going to be a little gritty and slightly heavy, but certainly managable. The SA should be great. The mag release(s) takes some getting use to but once you do I think you'll find it's about as natural as it can get.
 

Super Moderator
Joined
14,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Rob72,
Thanks man! I am printing the reference out as I type and guess what I'll be doing tonight?

The folks at the HKPRO forum seem to approach disassembling an H&K with much trepidation, claiming that the USP is too complicated. Maybe it is, but I kinda doubt it. I've built five 1911s from scratch, done trigger smoothing on Sigs and S&Ws so I should be ok.

I do heed the warning - don't mess with the sear and hammer engagements.
 

Super Moderator
Joined
14,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
P95Carry said:
Haha - Tangle - this is one of those ''I'm stuck with it'' deals!!!
I kinda figured that was the case.
P95Carry said:
...as we know, we move on to try or prefer other things...
Don't I know that!
P95Carry said:
...I should now be 226STCarry...:
Hmmm, that would mean I should be:
226_226R_226ST_USP_1911_and_sometimes_G17_Carry,
because I can't make up my mind what to carry. And even when I do carry one, I'm always thinking why it should be one I'm not carrying. Personal conflict don't you know.
P95Carry said:
... - but hey - I am stuck with the old ID I think - keeps folks guessing! :smile:
I like that, too!
 

Super Moderator
Joined
14,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
QKShooter said:
...Actually, I just checked and the FACTORY STANDARD hammer spring weight for the USP is 13# so...with a 14# spring you're good to go. :biggrin:
Hmmm, I may be remembering the weights wrong, but I sure thought stock is 16# and the one I put in was 14#. Now I'm gonna have to see what I did. :confused:
 

Super Moderator
Joined
14,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Well, QKShooter, I just looked it up, the hammer spring I installed was a 12# spring, not 14# as I thought. So, that would mean I went from 13# stock, to 12# - a lot of good that'll do.

Anyway, thanks much for catching that!
 
1 - 6 of 19 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top