Defensive Carry banner

Finally pulled the trigger (literally) on a SCCY CPX-3 (w/pics)

5K views 21 replies 17 participants last post by  CG11  
#1 ·
I've been waiting for a long time for someone to come out with a small, light, locked-breech, double stack .380. I won't deny that I would have preferred that it be Glock, SIG, S&W or Ruger (although Ruger has been iffy the past couple of years), but none of those guys have stepped up to the plate. I've been following SCCY teasing the CPX-3 for the past 18 months at least, even sending them a couple of emails last summer, which they did answer. So they finally released it in February (I think), and after chewing it over for a while, I decided to take a chance on the SCCY.

I bought it at a local gun store last Thursday, and I was telling the guys there that I don't buy budget brands so I was concerned about what I was getting. The owner told me they sell a lot of SCCYs and they've never had one come back, so I guess we'll see. They let me molest it for a while, and I was impressed with the fit and finish, so out the door I went with it.

Here's a picture of it in the box:



The trigger lock is the nicest I have ever seen on any gun I've ever purchased. OTOH, I must say that I was less than impressed with the finish on the magazines. Fortunately, they're very easy to disassemble, unlike the mags for some of my guns (cough...Glock...cough), so I took them apart and gave the bodies a good scrubbing. The patches were dark brown, and even after cleaning they don't look all that great. However, functionally they're just fine. Here's what the finish on the mags looks like:



Upon disassembling the gun, it's simple and seems ruggedly built. I probably should have taken a picture of it when it was disassembled, but I didn't. and I've now been drinking Absolut on the rocks for almost 2 hours, so I'm not going near it. But here are a couple of pictures of it all in one piece:





So I went to the range today, and I had a great time with this gun. I will admit that I wasn't prepared for the trigger. I had been dry firing it for the past few days, and I thought it was long, but smooth, but I haven't shot any non .22 for more than a year that wasn't a Glock. I haven't shot a DAO revolver in at least a year and a half, and I've never even owned a DAO pistol. Needless to say, dry firing and live firing are not the same thing, and it was an adventure at first. But I actually like the DAO trigger. It was smooth, with a long reset.

All told, I fired 320 rounds:

SIG Elite 100gr FMJ - 100 rounds
Aguila 95gr FMJ - 100 rounds
Speer Lawman 95gr FMJ - 100 rounds
Fort Scott 95gr "Tumble upon impact" - 20 rounds

Not so much as a hiccup. Nothing. Nada. From the gun's perspective, this was just a boring day at the office, but I was totally impressed. My G42 sure didn't behave like this on its first range trip. Nor did my SR9c, or my P938, or my LC9s, or my G48, or my SR22. OTOH, Both of my G26s and both of my Shields did behave like this, so there's that. The gun is as soft shooting as my G42, and the slide is easier to rack than any pistol I've ever owned that wasn't a .22. I wish ShooterGranny could shoot this pistol. I'd love to hear her opinion of it.

I probably shouldn't post this picture of my target, because all the pistoleros will be making fun of me, but I'm almost 66 and I wear progressive lenses and it's a wonder I hit the target at all, so bite me. Anyway, I just used one target today (first range session is about reliability), and here it is at the end of my session with 320 rounds, all at either 7 yards or 25 feet. Considering the DAO thing, I'm satisfied with this:



Needless to say, I couldn't be happier with the way this budget pistol has performed. I came home, cleaned it, loaded it, and since Vedder doesn't yet make a LightTuck for the CPX-3, I put it into its new Muddy River Tactical IWB holster, and it is now part of my carry rotation:



And since I have nothing more to say, here are a few more pictures of it with my G42 (with the Taran Tactical +1). It is obviously fatter than the 42, but it's thinner than my G26:





 
Discussion starter · #11 ·
Looks like you're happy with your new SCCY. I know from your previous posts you have been contemplating this purchase from some time. Good luck and may it be everything you had hoped for in a pistol.
Yeah, I've never purchased a budget pistol before, and I was hemming and hawing about this one for a while, maybe in the (so far) vain hope that SIG would release the P365 in .380. I've read a lot of good stuff about SCCY, but there's no denying the bad stuff like that one that blew up in the desert a few years ago. OTOH, SIG has actually been sued over their P320, and has already paid off at least one cop who was shot (in Stamford, CT), and I don't hear about people boycotting them.

As I said, the CPX-3 appears to be very solidly built, and it performed well, so I'm good.
 
Discussion starter · #13 ·
Nice report. Why this pistol when you have a G42?
Basically, 10+1.

And now that I have it, an added benefit is that the CPX-3's slide is easier to rack than the 42. I have some arthritis in my hands, and these things are becoming more important. As much as I love my G26, the slide is getting harder to deal with. I can manage it OK, but I can't be at all casual about it. I have to get a good overhand grip and go hard. With the SCCY, I can hold the pistol in my right hand, grab the slide serrations with my left thumb and forefinger and casually pull the slide all the way to the rear. Over time, I see an easy to rack, soft shooting .380 taking a larger role in my life.

If the Shield EZ was a 10 (or more)+1 double stack with a bit shorter grip, I would have bought that. But I'm pleased with what I got.