This item has been around for awhile, but this is the first video I've seen on it (not that I was looking for one before). I think this is a very clever addition for a Glock and if I was carrying a Glock regularly, I would have one of these.
I believe you are correct.I remember the Springfield one being protruded when cocked but the PPS classic one for sure only begins to come out as you squeeze the trigger.
It wasn't my gun but I do remember thumbing it and trying to pull the trigger when unloaded and couldn't make it go click.
There's threads about it over at the Walther Forums.
https://www.waltherforums.com/forum/pps/29234-thumb-over-cocking-indicator-when-reholstering.html
Maybe @Militant can test with it unloaded and confirm for us.
Its designed to let the user know the striker is moving when it shouldn't be.You won't feel the strike indicator with lead in your leg.
That device is to let the user know the striker is cocked only, it is not a feature that would keep the trigger from being pulled.
Not the XD design.Its designed to let the user know the striker is moving when it shouldn't be.
Correct. The XD series guns have a cocked striker indicator on the rear of the slide. It protrudes when cocked. They also have a loaded chamber indicator on top near the ejection port.I remember the Springfield one being protruded when cocked....
Muzzle flash is a pretty good indicator also.These allow the operator to tell in the dark if their gun is cocked and/or has a round chambered.
Operators know if their guns are loaded. :yup:Correct. The XD series guns have a cocked striker indicator on the rear of the slide. It protrudes when cocked. They also have a loaded chamber indicator on top near the ejection port.
These allow the operator to tell in the dark if their gun is cocked and/or has a round chambered.
Are those the same “operators” who carry “full sized fighting pistols” (sic)? :rofl:Operators know if their guns are loaded. :yup:
The most clueful people I know don't need an SCD, haven't needed an SCD nor ever will need one to reholster a glock safely.The most cluefull people I know use SCDs on their Glocks.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
True. There are operators and there are operators. In this context, I was referring to just operators.Operators know if their guns are loaded. :yup:
🤔🤔🤔🤔The most clueful people I know don't need an SCD, haven't needed an SCD nor ever will need one to reholster a glock safely.
I see the Striker Control Device as getting you the same level of safety as the XD grip safety, in a slightly different way. Instead of lifting the palm away from the grip safety slightly as you guide the gun into your holster, the very same action has you with the thumb on the SCD.The lack of a manual safety is the main reason I've never owned a Glock and don't plan to. Like I've always said, the trigger "safety" isn't one as far as I'm concerned, because if my finger is on the trigger.....
I have four XD's, different models and all in .45. But if they didn't have the grip safety, I would look elsewhere.
I have been involved in after action investigations as well. I have seen cops shoot themselves in the butt with double action revolvers. Everything you do to idiot proof something creates another failure point and the true idiots are immune anyway.
You could just not have your finger by the trigger, but that would be too simple.
What I worry most about is the "brain fart". Over familiarity, a moment's inattention, BOOM! Anything technological that helps head that off, is good.This is my safety.....unfortunately your safety is being run by your brain. Brain fog, brain fart, mental fatigue, adrenaline dump or any number of things can make your safety....well not that safe.
Then there is "my safety is between my ears" uh huh how many times has that guy let you down over the years??
...
Lol rant over, heck I dont even own a glock!!!! But if I did I would install this device on it.
I don't know that I need an SCD but I do prefer having one. Until someone shows me a distinct downside I'll probably continue feeling that way.The most clueful people I know don't need an SCD, haven't needed an SCD nor ever will need one to reholster a glock safely.
I don't think its unrealistic. For example: you are attacked. You draw your weapon, the attacker puts his hands up. You tell him to get on the ground and hold him at gunpoint until police arrive.I suppose I shouldn’t make absolute statements, however, with most of this stuff, I’d say in situations where you can’t verify that your holster is clear, you’re probably not in a position where you should be holstering your gun.
That sounds like a situation where you either aren’t ready to reholsfer or you don’t need to be holding them at gunpoint.I don't think its unrealistic. For example: you are attacked. You draw your weapon, the attacker puts his hands up. You tell him to get on the ground and hold him at gunpoint until police arrive.
So: the cruiser is now coming up the block. Do you take your eyes off the attacker to holster? Keep the gun in hand? Drop the gun?
IMHO, the safest thing to do is to keep eyes on the attacker while holstering (or, if it's a typical concealment holster that makes it difficult, putting the handgun in your waistband). It's hard to do that safely with a standard Glock.
That's not really where I was coming from about the grip safety. I wasn't talking about holstering. It's just the fact that there's a striker-fired gun in my pocket with one in the pipe. I feel better having some form of manual safety on board.I see the Striker Control Device as getting you the same level of safety as the XD grip safety, in a slightly different way. Instead of lifting the palm away from the grip safety slightly as you guide the gun into your holster, the very same action has you with the thumb on the SCD.